Daily Edition Sources +4

OpenClaw Lets Agents Wake After A Command Exits

OpenClaw added an on-exit cron schedule so a gateway-owned watcher can wake an agent after a watched process finishes.

Rough Diagram Punk poster showing OpenClaw command exit as a gateway-owned trigger with a one-shot caveat.
Diagram PunkOpenClaw moves command-exit wakeups under gateway supervision.
repo openclaw/openclaw evidence
4 source signals 1 repo commit 68bfa42
Evidence: commit 68bfa42 / July 2, 2026 / Daily Edition
Open Edition Evidence below

OpenClaw changed its agent cron system on July 1, adding an on-exit schedule in commit 68bfa42b9b so a gateway supervisor can watch a command, persist one-shot completion, and fire the existing wake pipeline after the process exits.

For agent operators, the watch item is whether background work becomes an auditable runtime contract: the source now separates a turn-owned command from a gateway-owned watcher that survives the turn.

Facts

  • Commit 68bfa42b9b adds the on-exit schedule kind across CLI flags, protocol schema, cron storage, gateway watchers, and UI presentation.
  • The design note says agent-spawned background processes die with turn cleanup, so the watcher moves under the gateway supervisor instead.
  • The new watcher persists completion before firing the job and fails closed if storing that terminal state fails.

Evidence

The public sources are the OpenClaw commit, its DESIGN-cron-on-exit.md note, the gateway watcher implementation, and the gateway-protocol cron schema. Together they show the trigger, the delivery path, and the caveat that the first version is a one-shot command-exit watcher, not a general process monitor.

Context

This is page-one because it changes the operator model. A long build, deploy, or test can become a first-class wake condition instead of a fragile shell trick inside an agent turn. Builders should watch whether the same pattern appears around PID watching, repeated exits, and delivery diagnostics.

Limits

The commit does not prove production adoption, cross-project standardization, or a released user interface. What to watch: whether OpenClaw documents examples for real operator workflows and whether the deferred PID-watch variant lands without weakening the fail-closed replay guard.

Evidence Trail

Receipts below the story

The article above is the public narrative. This section keeps the source trail and limits on the same page.

Edition
DateJuly 2, 2026
LaneDaily Edition
Confidence78%
Sources4
Reposopenclaw/openclaw

Primary Evidence

Evidence Limits

  • These sources do not prove a public release, production adoption, or a cross-project standard.
  • What to watch: whether OpenClaw documents real operator examples and lands the deferred PID-watch or repeat-watch variants without weakening the replay guard.
Letters & Corrections

Send a note to the desk

Corrections, missing context, or a follow-up lead.